Key Concepts:
– Supreme Court Chief Justice emphasized that personal interests should not hinder public infrastructure development.
– The Gauhati High Court Bar Association’s opposition to new infrastructure was cited as a case where individual or collective resistance lacks public justification.
Relevance for UPSC:
– Highlights judicial perspectives on balancing individual rights with public good.
– Illustrates conflicts in governance and judiciary relating to infrastructural growth.
– Useful for topics on governance, judiciary, and law in UPSC syllabus.
Implications:
– Sets precedent encouraging judicial support for infrastructure projects.
– Advocates rational public discourse over personal or sectional interests.
– Strengthens understanding of legal frameworks promoting public infrastructure.
Source: https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/personal-interests-not-grounds-for-opposing-new-infrastructure-cji-on-gauhati-high-court-bar-associations-stir/article70497524.ece?
upscind.com